0 Comments
| AMD Athlon X2 4800+ vs II X3 455 |
Released May, 2006
AMD Athlon X2 4800+
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon X2 4800+
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
VS
Released December, 2010
AMD Athlon II X3 455
- 3.3 GHz
- Tri core
Reasons to buy the II X3 455
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 0.5 MB |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 2,775 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 113.47W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 39.57 $/year | 2.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | 2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l3 cache | 0.5 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark score | 2,775 | vs | 1,260 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,131 | vs | 749 | More than 50% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 4,252 | vs | 1,690 | More than 2.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More cores | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.96 GHz | vs | 2.75 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 75 °C | vs | 55 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.67 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.04 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Dec, 2010 | vs | May, 2006 | Release date over 4 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon X2 4800+ vs II X3 455
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4800+
1,741
Athlon II X3 455
4,471
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4800+
994
Athlon II X3 455
1,676
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4800+
68.2 MB/s
Athlon II X3 455
132,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4800+
1,690
Athlon II X3 455
4,252
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4800+
2,822
Athlon II X3 455
6,450
GeekBench
Athlon X2 4800+
2,822
Athlon II X3 455
6,450
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Athlon X2 4800+
1,260
Athlon II X3 455
2,775
PassMark (Single Core)
Athlon X2 4800+
749
Athlon II X3 455
1,131
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon X2 4800+ | vs | II X3 455 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Tri core | |
Socket type | |||
AM2 | |||
939 | |||
AM3 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 39.57 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.8 pt/W | 1.11 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 113.47W |
details | Athlon X2 4800+ | vs | II X3 455 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 3 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.67 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0.17 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 55°C | Unknown - 75°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 13 | 4 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 2.75 GHz | 3.96 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.4 GHz | 4.04 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.75 GHz | 3.96 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Athlon X2 4800+ ![]() | AMD Athlon II X3 455 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||