CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4450e vs 215 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon X2 4450e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 4450e

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 52.81W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 78 °C vs 74 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 215

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 215

Report a correction
Much better PassMark score 1,580 vs 1,098 Around 45% better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 907 vs 669 More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,410 vs 1,585 More than 50% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.56 GHz vs 3.01 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.79 GHz vs 3.27 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Sep, 2009 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon X2 4450e vs II X2 215

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon X2 4450e
63,550 MB/s
Athlon II X2 215
109,100 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon X2 4450e  vs
II X2 215 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
AM2
AM3
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 65W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.56 pt/W 1.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 52.81W

details

Athlon X2 4450e  vs
II X2 215 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 78°C Unknown - 74°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.01 GHz 3.56 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.27 GHz 3.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.01 GHz 3.56 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Athlon X2 4450e
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X2 215
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus