0 Comments
| AMD Athlon X2 4400+ vs II X2 250 |
VS
Released June, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 250
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the II X2 250
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74 °C | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon X2 4400+ vs the Athlon II X2 250. | |||||||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74 °C | vs | 55 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 72.31W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Athlon X2 4400+ vs II X2 250
clock speed
Athlon X2 4400+
2.2 GHz
Athlon II X2 250
3 GHz
L2 cache
Athlon X2 4400+
2 MB
Athlon II X2 250
2 MB
L3 cache
Athlon X2 4400+
0 MB
Athlon II X2 250
0 MB
TDP
Athlon X2 4400+
89W
Athlon II X2 250
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon X2 4400+ | vs | II X2 250 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
AM2 | |||
AM3 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
BMI1 | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
ABM | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 89W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 21.44 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 77.96 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 72.31W | 52.81W |
details | Athlon X2 4400+ | vs | II X2 250 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 55°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Athlon X2 4400+ ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 250 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||