0 Comments
| AMD Athlon X2 4200+ vs II X2 260 |
VS
Released May, 2010
AMD Athlon II X2 260
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the II X2 260
![]() | Much more l3 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon X2 4200+ vs the Athlon II X2 260. | |||||||
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark score | 1,882 | vs | 1,099 | More than 70% better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,076 | vs | 667 | More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,886 | vs | 1,586 | More than 80% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 1.91 pt/W | vs | 0.52 pt/W | Around 3.8x better performance per watt | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74 °C | vs | 49 °C | More than 50% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.84 GHz | vs | 2.65 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 72.31W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.91 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | May, 2010 | vs | May, 2005 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon X2 4200+ vs II X2 260
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4200+
1,627
Athlon II X2 260
3,015
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4200+
906
Athlon II X2 260
1,628
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4200+
59.9 MB/s
Athlon II X2 260
128,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4200+
1,586
Athlon II X2 260
2,886
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon X2 4200+
1,825
Athlon II X2 260
4,749
GeekBench
Athlon X2 4200+
2,686
Athlon II X2 260
4,749
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Athlon X2 4200+
1,099
Athlon II X2 260
1,882
PassMark (Single Core)
Athlon X2 4200+
667
Athlon II X2 260
1,076
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon X2 4200+ | vs | II X2 260 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
AM2 | |||
939 | |||
AM3 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 89W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 21.44 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 77.96 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.52 pt/W | 1.91 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 72.31W | 52.81W |
details | Athlon X2 4200+ | vs | II X2 260 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 1 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 49°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.65 GHz | 3.84 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.9 GHz | 3.91 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.65 GHz | 3.84 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Athlon X2 4200+ ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 260 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||