CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4050e vs 7310 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD A6 7310 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A6 7310  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A6 7310

AMD A6 7310

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon X2 4050e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 4050e

Report a correction
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.01 GHz vs 2.38 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of AMD A6 7310

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 7310

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 36.56W 3x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 8.15 pt/W vs 1.44 pt/W Around 5.8x better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 78 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better PassMark (Single core) score 911 vs 641 More than 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 2,663 vs 1,086 Around 2.5x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 10.84 $/year 3x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon X2 4050e vs A6 7310

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A6 7310
2,663

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon X2 4050e  vs
A6 7310 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
FMA4
3DNow!
AES

power consumption

TDP 45W 15W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 1.44 pt/W 8.15 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 12.19W

details

Athlon X2 4050e  vs
A6 7310 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 0.5 MB None
Manufacture process 65 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 78°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.01 GHz 2.38 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.1 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.01 GHz 2.38 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ R4
Latest DirectX N/A 12.0
GPU clock speed N/A 800 MHz
AMD Athlon X2 4050e
Report a correction
AMD A6 7310
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus