0 Comments
| AMD Athlon II X2 B26 vs 215 |
Released May, 2010
AMD Athlon II X2 B26
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 B26
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 215
- 2.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 215
![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.79 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4 GHz | vs | 3.56 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | May, 2010 | vs | Sep, 2009 | Release date 8 months later | |||
| |||||||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.79 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon II X2 B26 vs 215
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 B26
3,070
Athlon II X2 215
2,535
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 B26
1,635
Athlon II X2 215
1,380
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 B26
129.4 MB/s
Athlon II X2 215
109,100 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Athlon II X2 B26
1,820
Athlon II X2 215
1,580
PassMark (Single Core)
Athlon II X2 B26
1,093
Athlon II X2 215
907
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon II X2 B26 | vs | 215 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
details | Athlon II X2 B26 | vs | 215 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.56 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 3.79 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4 GHz | 3.56 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.25 pt/W | 1.62 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W |
AMD Athlon II X2 B26 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 215 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | ||
B26 vs 2120 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
B26 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
B26 vs 640 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
B26 vs B24 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
215 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | ||
215 vs 820 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
215 vs 6000+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||