0 Comments
| AMD Athlon II X2 265 vs 250 |
Released September, 2010
AMD Athlon II X2 265
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 265
![]() | Much more l3 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3.3 GHz |
![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.86 GHz |
VS
Released June, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 250
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 250
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 1.79 pt/W |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.86 GHz | vs | 3.72 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Sep, 2010 | vs | Jun, 2009 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better performance per watt | 1.79 pt/W | vs | 1.11 pt/W | More than 60% better performance per watt | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 102.72W | Around 50% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 36.79 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 101.7 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.04 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon II X2 265 vs 250
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 265
3,122
Athlon II X2 250
2,814
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 265
1,703
Athlon II X2 250
1,524
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 265
133,500 MB/s
Athlon II X2 250
120,700 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 265
3,034
Athlon II X2 250
2,690
GeekBench
Athlon II X2 265
4,028
Athlon II X2 250
4,461
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Athlon II X2 265
1,876
Athlon II X2 250
1,750
PassMark (Single Core)
Athlon II X2 265
1,110
Athlon II X2 250
1,008
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon II X2 265 | vs | 250 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
BMI1 | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
ABM | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 36.79 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 101.7 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.11 pt/W | 1.79 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 102.72W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
details | Athlon II X2 265 | vs | 250 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 1 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.82 - 1.4V | 0.85 - 1.43V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.86 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.3 GHz | 4.04 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.86 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Athlon II X2 265 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 250 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
250 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
250 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
250 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$95 | ||
250 vs 955 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||