Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 250

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 1,750 vs 544 Around 3.2x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,008 vs 653 Around 55% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,690 vs 824 More than 3.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 3400+ vs the Athlon II X2 250.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon II X2 250 vs 64 3400+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon II X2 250  vs
64 3400+ 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
AM3
939

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
ABM
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

details

Athlon II X2 250  vs
64 3400+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 52.81W N/A
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus