CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 250 vs 5500

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
AMD A8 5500 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A8 5500  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A8 5500

AMD A8 5500

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 250

Report a correction
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.73 GHz vs 3.23 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 74 °C vs 71.3 °C Around 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Front view of AMD A8 5500

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 5500

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 4,033 vs 1,767 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,269 vs 1,016 Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better geekbench (64-bit) score 5,054 vs 2,835 Around 80% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 3,080 vs 1,810 More than 70% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better performance per watt 7.19 pt/W vs 4.62 pt/W More than 55% better performance per watt
Slightly better performance per dollar 6.87 pt/$ vs 6.01 pt/$ Around 15% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.54 GHz vs 3.96 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon II X2 250 vs A8 5500

GeekBench (32-bit)

GeekBench (64-bit)

GeekBench

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Athlon II X2 250 A8 5500 @ community.futuremark.com

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon II X2 250  vs
A8 5500 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7560D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0

details

Athlon II X2 250  vs
A8 5500 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.43V 0.83 - 1.48V
Operating temperature Unknown - 74°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 25 1
Overclocked clock speed 3.73 GHz 3.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.96 GHz 4.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.73 GHz 3.23 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 65W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 4.62 pt/W 7.19 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 52.81W
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Report a correction
AMD A8 5500
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus