0 Comments
| AMD Athlon II X2 240 vs 64 X2 5000+ |
Released July, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 240
- 2.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 240
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 938 | ![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,513 |
VS
Released December, 2006
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the 64 X2 5000+
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.39 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 938 | vs | 779 | More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,513 | vs | 1,857 | More than 35% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 1.67 pt/W | vs | 0.61 pt/W | Around 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.67 GHz | vs | 3.13 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 72.31W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 74 °C | vs | 70 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Jul, 2009 | vs | Dec, 2006 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.39 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon II X2 240 vs 64 X2 5000+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 240
2,624
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
1,767.5
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 240
1,423
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
994.5
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 240
112,300 MB/s
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
64.85 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 240
2,513
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
1,857
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Athlon II X2 240
4,487
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
3,326
GeekBench
Athlon II X2 240
4,487
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
3,326
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Athlon II X2 240
1,642
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
1,497
PassMark (Single Core)
Athlon II X2 240
938
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon II X2 240 | vs | 64 X2 5000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
AM2 | |||
Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Athlon II X2 240 | vs | 64 X2 5000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.67 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 3.39 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 2,103.5 | 1,518.5 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.67 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 89W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.67 pt/W | 0.61 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 72.31W |
AMD Athlon II X2 240 ![]() | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
6000+ vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
140 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 240 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||