CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 210e vs P320 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Athlon II X2 210e 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Athlon II X2 210e  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 210e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 210e

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.55 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,361 vs 987 Around 40% better geekbench 3 single core score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,532 vs 1,853 More than 35% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Aug, 2010 vs May, 2010 Release date 3 months later
Front view of AMD Athlon II PCs P320

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II PCs P320

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 36.56W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 3.13 pt/W vs 1.49 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 10.84 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 39.42 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon II X2 210e vs PCs P320

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon II X2 210e
105.2 MB/s
Athlon II PCs P320
83,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon II X2 210e  vs
PCs P320 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
AM3
S1
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 25W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 1.49 pt/W 3.13 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 20.31W

details

Athlon II X2 210e  vs
PCs P320 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.55 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.55 GHz 2.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,000 MHz 533 MHz
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II PCs P320
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus