Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A10 4600M

AMD A10 4600M

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.25 GHz vs 2.93 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.38 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A10 4600M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 4600M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 3,679 vs 2,081 More than 75% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 72.31W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 11.44 pt/W vs 0.69 pt/W More than 16.5x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,860 vs 1,952.5 Around 2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,434 vs 1,217.5 Around 20% better geekbench 3 single core score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs A10 4600M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon 64 X2 5800+
80.1 MB/s
A10 4600M
1,670,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 X2 5800+  vs
A10 4600M 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Athlon 64 X2 5800+  vs
A10 4600M 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.25 GHz 2.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.38 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.25 GHz 2.93 GHz

power consumption

TDP 89W 35W
Annual home energy cost 21.44 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 77.96 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 0.69 pt/W 11.44 pt/W
Typical power consumption 72.31W 28.44W
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Report a correction
AMD A10 4600M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus