CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 57 vs 5700

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
AMD A10 5700 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A10 5700  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A10 5700

AMD A10 5700

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 57

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 57

Report a correction
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 71.3 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 25.19W vs 52.81W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A10 5700

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5700

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz Around 80% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,353 vs 829 Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 4,211 vs 731 More than 5.8x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 5,135 vs 1,294 Around 4x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.24 GHz vs 3.14 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 64 X2 57 vs A10 5700

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Passmark

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 X2 57  vs
A10 5700 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
AES

power consumption

TDP 31W 65W
Annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 5.2 pt/W 7.32 pt/W
Typical power consumption 25.19W 52.81W

details

Athlon 64 X2 57  vs
A10 5700 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 0 2
Overclocked clock speed 3.14 GHz 4.24 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 3.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.14 GHz 4.24 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7660D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 760 MHz
AMD Athlon 64 X2 57
Report a correction
AMD A10 5700
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus