AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs FX 53 |
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
 | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | | More cores 2 |
| | More threads 2 | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
VS
Released March, 2004
AMD Athlon 64 FX 53
- 2.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the FX 53
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 72.31W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs FX 53
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ | vs | FX 53 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM2 | |||
| 939 | |||
| 940 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
details | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ | vs | FX 53 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 89W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 72.31W | |
 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 FX 53 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 4400+ vs E6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | ||
| 4400+ vs 640 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $74 | ||
| 4400+ vs 820 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 4400+ vs 550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| 4400+ vs E5300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 4400+ vs 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 4400+ vs 965 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
