CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4400+ vs 4400M among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD A6 4400M 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A6 4400M  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A6 4400M

AMD A6 4400M

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Report a correction
Better PassMark (Overclocked) score 1,605.4 vs 982.4 Around 65% better PassMark (Overclocked) score
Front view of AMD A6 4400M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 4400M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 76.62 pt/$ vs 4.53 pt/$ Around 17x better performance per dollar
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 995 vs 678 More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.2 GHz vs 2.72 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs A6 4400M

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 X2 4400+  vs
A6 4400M 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Athlon 64 X2 4400+  vs
A6 4400M 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.72 GHz 3.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 2.7 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,605.4 982.4
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.72 GHz 3.2 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.37 pt/W 8.76 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 28.44W
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Report a correction
AMD A6 4400M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus