CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4400+ vs 4400M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
AMD A6 4400M 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A6 4400M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A6 4400M

AMD A6 4400M

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Report a correction
Slightly better PassMark (Overclocked) score 1,503.7 vs 982.4 Around 55% better PassMark (Overclocked) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.03 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A6 4400M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 4400M

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 90 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Better 3DMark11 physics score 2,370 vs 960 Around 2.5x better 3DMark11 physics score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 995 vs 678 More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.19 GHz vs 2.72 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 8.4 pt/W vs 2.34 pt/W More than 3.5x better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs A6 4400M

GeekBench

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ A6 4400M @ community.futuremark.com

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 X2 4400+  vs
A6 4400M 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.34 pt/W 8.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 28.44W

details

Athlon 64 X2 4400+  vs
A6 4400M 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.72 GHz 3.19 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.03 GHz 2.7 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,503.7 982.4
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.72 GHz 3.19 GHz
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Report a correction
AMD A6 4400M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus