AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs A4 4000 |
VS
Released May, 2013
AMD A4 4000
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the A4 4000
 | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
| | Much better PassMark score 1,809 | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,103 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs the A4 4000. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 1,809 | vs | 1,145 | Around 60% better PassMark score | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,103 | vs | 691 | Around 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,502 | vs | 1,629 | Around 55% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 5.4 pt/W | vs | 0.89 pt/W | More than 6x better performance per watt | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.02 GHz | vs | 2.75 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.49 GHz | vs | 3.13 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs A4 4000
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ | vs | A4 4000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| ABM | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ | vs | A4 4000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.75 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.13 GHz | 3.49 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,605.4 | 1,069.1 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.75 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.89 pt/W | 5.4 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+  Report a correction |  AMD A4 4000 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $45 | |
| 3220 vs 4000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $45 | ||
| 250 vs 4000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $45 | ||
| 5150 vs 4000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $45 | ||
| 6300 vs 4000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $45 | |
| 5300 vs 4000 | ||
 | VS |  |
| E6300 vs 4400+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | ||
| E8400 vs 4400+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
