Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.24 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.79 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon 3800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3800+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 3800+ vs the Athlon 64 LE-1640.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 64 LE-1640 vs 3800+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon 3800+
64.55 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 LE-1640  vs
3800+ 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
AM2
939

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Athlon 64 LE-1640  vs
3800+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 0 7
Overclocked clock speed 3.24 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.79 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.24 GHz 2.8 GHz

power consumption

TDP 45W 45W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.93 pt/W 0.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 36.56W
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3800+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus