Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 3400+ vs the A10 6800K.

Front view of AMD A10 6800K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 6800K

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 4.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Much better PassMark score 4,893 vs 544 Around 9x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,542 vs 653 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 6,280 vs 824 More than 7.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 64 3400+ vs A10 6800K

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 3400+  vs
A10 6800K 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 4.1 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
ABM
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

details

Athlon 64 3400+  vs
A10 6800K 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 81.25W
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Report a correction
AMD A10 6800K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus