Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 55 °C More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD Athlon 3500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3500+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 72.31W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 77.96 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 21.44 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Feb, 2007 vs May, 2006 Release date 9 months later

Features Key features of the Athlon 64 3200+  vs 3500+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 3200+  vs
3500+ 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Athlon 64 3200+  vs
3500+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 55°C

power consumption

TDP 89W 45W
Annual home energy cost 21.44 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 77.96 $/year 39.42 $/year
Typical power consumption 72.31W 36.56W
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3500+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus