Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 49 °C Around 45% higher Maximum operating temperature
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of AMD Athlon 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3200+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 54.44W vs 72.31W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 16.14 $/year vs 21.44 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 58.69 $/year vs 77.96 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Athlon 64 3200+  vs 3200+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 3200+  vs
3200+ 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
AM2
939

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Athlon 64 3200+  vs
3200+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 49°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 3 4

power consumption

TDP 89W 67W
Annual home energy cost 21.44 $/year 16.14 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 77.96 $/year 58.69 $/year
Typical power consumption 72.31W 54.44W
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus