Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A6 6310

AMD A6 6310

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.87 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A6 6310

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 6310

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 1,085,000 MB/s vs 52.6 MB/s Around 20627.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 3,150 vs 770 More than 4x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per watt 21.28 pt/W vs 0.34 pt/W More than 61.8x better performance per watt
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 72.31W 5.9x lower typical power consumption
Newer Apr, 2014 vs May, 2006 Release date over 8 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 70 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better PassMark score 2,414 vs 448 Around 5.5x better PassMark score
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 5.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 5.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 64 3200+ vs A6 6310

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon 64 3200+
52.6 MB/s
A6 6310
1,085,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

A6 6310
3,560

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 64 3200+  vs
A6 6310 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Socket type
754
AM2
BGA 769

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Athlon 64 3200+  vs
A6 6310 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.69 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.87 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz 2.4 GHz

power consumption

TDP 89W 15W
Annual home energy cost 21.44 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 77.96 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 0.34 pt/W 21.28 pt/W
Typical power consumption 72.31W 12.19W
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Report a correction
AMD A6 6310
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus