CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5150 vs 4000 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Athlon 5150 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Athlon 5150  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 5150

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 5150

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 52.81W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Dec, 2013 vs May, 2013 Release date 7 months later
Front view of AMD A4 4000

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 4000

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 5150 vs A4 4000

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Athlon 5150
15.54 mHash/s
A4 4000
20.49 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Athlon 5150
0.36 fps
A4 4000
0.38 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Athlon 5150
1,700
A4 4000
1,875

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Athlon 5150
1,546
A4 4000
1,282

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

Athlon 5150
2,477
A4 4000
2,076

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon 5150
2,942
A4 4000
2,519

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A4 4000
1,622

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon 5150
819.5 MB/s
A4 4000
1,830,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 5150  vs
A4 4000 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE Family
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
ABM
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333

details

Athlon 5150  vs
A4 4000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 70°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon HD 8400 Radeon™ HD 7480D
GPU clock speed 600 MHz 720 MHz

power consumption

TDP 25W 65W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 3.73 pt/W 5.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 52.81W
AMD Athlon 5150
Report a correction
AMD A4 4000
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus