CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4000+ vs 3800+ among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Athlon 4000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 4000+

Report a correction
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.97 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Aug, 2005 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon 3800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3800+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 72.31W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 55 °C vs 49 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 77.96 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 21.44 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Athlon 4000+ vs 3800+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Athlon 4000+
78 MB/s
Athlon 3800+
64.55 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Athlon 4000+  vs
3800+ 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
S1
939
AM2
754
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 89W 45W
Annual home energy cost 21.44 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 77.96 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.51 pt/W 0.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 72.31W 36.56W

details

Athlon 4000+  vs
3800+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 49°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.97 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.97 GHz 2.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Athlon 4000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3800+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus