0 Comments
| AMD Athlon 3000+ vs A4 3300 |
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Athlon 3000+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 3000+
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
Released September, 2011
AMD A4 3300
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the A4 3300
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 0.5 MB |
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz | ![]() | More cores 2 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l3 cache | 0.5 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | 25% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 0.25 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 72.31W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Athlon 3000+ vs A4 3300
clock speed
Athlon 3000+
2 GHz
A4 3300
2.5 GHz
L2 cache
Athlon 3000+
1 MB
A4 3300
1 MB
L3 cache
Athlon 3000+
0 MB
A4 3300
0.5 MB
TDP
Athlon 3000+
89W
A4 3300
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Athlon 3000+ | vs | A4 3300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
754 | |||
FM1 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 89W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 21.44 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 77.96 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 72.31W | 52.81W |
details | Athlon 3000+ | vs | A4 3300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 130 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Athlon 3000+ ![]() | AMD A4 3300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A8 5500B | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | $353 | |
Intel Core i5 750 vs i7 875K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$456 | $160 | |
Intel Core i7 3930K vs AMD FX 8150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | ||
AMD FX 6300 vs A4 7th Gen A4-9120 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $179 | |
Intel Celeron E3400 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $134 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $179 | |
Intel Celeron E3400 vs Core2 Quad Q8300 | ||