0 Comments
|
|
| by Chris-Angelini (Jan, 2014) by Ian-Cutress (Mar, 2014) | |
|
Features Key features of the Intel Xeon E5-4603 v2
clock speed
turbo clock speed
L3 cache
TDP
In The News From around the web
17 Mar | |
The ultra-high-end enthusiast also wants all the bells and whistles, such as overclockability, a good range of DRAM speed support and top quality construction materials.
My goal was to find out where these two CPUs stand in what I consider ‘an enthusiast user’s scenario’, and as such we used the same benchmarks as in the AMD Kaveri launch article, involving gaming, compression, rendering, video conversion and 2D image to 3D modeling creation.
19 Feb | |
Beyond two times better performance power, Intel is promising a few other upgrades with the next generation of this data-focused chipset, including triple the memory capacity, four times the I/O bandwidth and the potential to reduce total cost of ownership by up to 80 percent.
There was also talk of 40W, 1.4GHz models at ISSCC but they have not been announced yet.
19 Feb | |
This should be the first time since Sandy Bridge-E (2011) that expensive PCs get a healthy boost to single-threaded performance, clock for clock.
Heading into the third quarter, we should see Haswell-E make an appearance for the enthusiast desktop and moderately high-end server.
11 Feb | |
2.8 GHz Turbo Frequency (though the design will scale to 3.8 GHz).
Judging by the available information, it would seem that Intel are preparing a stack of ‘Ivytown’ processors along this design, and thus a range of Xeon E7 processors, from 1.4 GHz to 3.8 GHz, drawing between 40W and 150W, similar to the Xeon E5 v2 range.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz |
---|---|
Turbo clock speed | 2.2 GHz |
Cores | Quad core |
features
Has a NX bit | Yes |
---|---|
Supports trusted computing | Yes |
Has virtualization support | Yes |
Instruction set extensions |
|
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
TDP | 95W |
---|---|
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W |
bus
Architecture | QPI |
---|---|
Number of links | 2 |
Data rate | 51,200 MB/s |
Transfer rate | 6,400 MT/s |
Clock speed | 3,200 MHz |
details
Architecture | x86-64 |
---|---|
Threads | 8 threads |
L3 cache | 10 MB |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core |
Manufacture process | 22 nm |
Max CPUs | 4 |
Voltage range | 0.65 - 1.3V |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 77°C |
integrated graphics
GPU | None |
---|---|
Label | None |
Latest DirectX | None |
Number of displays supported | None |
GPU clock speed | None |
Turbo clock speed | None |
3DMark06 | None |
memory controller
Memory controller | Built-in |
---|---|
Memory type |
|
Channels | Quad Channel |
Supports ECC | Yes |
Maximum bandwidth | 42,666.64 MB/s |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB |

Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$296 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$168 | $300 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
N4200 vs 6100U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$296 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$296 | $85 | |
6700K vs 5800K | ||