|
| 5.2 Out of 10 |  | by Ian-Cutress (Aug, 2013) by Ian-Cutress (Aug, 2013) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Xeon E5 2687W v2 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Xeon E5 2687W v2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
In The News From around the web
| 9 Aug |
|
With any luck we should be getting a couple of Ivy Bridge-E based server motherboards in to test, along with Xeon processors.
> Haswell Xeons, these processors, destined for 2P systems, will take on the E5 26xx naming scheme with V2 on the end, with L designating low power versions.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 3.4 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 4 GHz |
| Cores | Octa core |
| Socket type | LGA 2011 |
| Is unlocked | No |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 150W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 36.13 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 131.4 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 4.42 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 121.88W |
bus
| Architecture | QPI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 2 |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 16 threads |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.31 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 25 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 3.13 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm |
| Max CPUs | 2 |
| Clock multiplier | 34 |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C |
integrated graphics
| GPU | None |
|---|
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Quad Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 59,733.32 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 262,144 MB |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
