|
| 5.4 Out of 10 |  | by Johan-De-Gelas (Sep, 2014) by Johan-De-Gelas (Sep, 2014) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Xeon E5-2658 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Xeon E5-2658
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 8 Sep |
|
However, it's not a case of the Haswell's L3 cache being a lot worse: the 20MB L3 cache of the Xeon E5-2667 v3 is only slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2690 and is still faster than the Xeon E5-2697 v2 (30MB).
Of course, those kind of bandwidth numbers only matter for specific HPC benchmarks as the L3 cache (30-45MB L3) will take care of most of the requests.
| 16 Dec |
|
They claim it will be Intel's first 14nm Xeon processor which obviously suggests that it will not be preceded by Broadwell in the lower performance server categories.
Intel will apparently allow Haswell and Broadwell to give off a little more heat than their predecessors.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 2.1 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Cores | Octa core |
| Socket type | LGA 2011 |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 95W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 3.46 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W |
bus
| Architecture | QPI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 2 |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 16 threads |
| L2 cache | 2 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 20 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm |
| Max CPUs | 2 |
| Clock multiplier | 24 |
| Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 88°C |
integrated graphics
| GPU | None |
|---|
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Quad Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 51,200 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
