|
| 5.3 Out of 10 |  | by Ian-Cutress (Oct, 2014) by Ian-Cutress (Nov, 2014) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Xeon E5-2650L among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Xeon E5-2650L
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 6 Nov |
|
Similarly to the E5-2687W V3, the moment we hit a frequency the system does not like, it returns as a complete failed POST rather than a BSOD.
As part of this review we were able to source two E5-2650L V3 CPUs with a dual CPU motherboard and offer a more competitive analysis at 130-135W total TDP against the E5-2690 V3.
| 13 Oct |
|
It might also come to pass that some server motherboard manufacturers will end up supporting the DDR4-2133 at 3DPC, similar to some efforts made with Patsburg.
Low quality conversion loves faster individual cores, hence the W processor wins out due to its higher full-load frequency.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Cores | Octa core |
| Socket type | LGA 2011 |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 70W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 16.86 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 61.32 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 7.1 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 56.88W |
bus
| Architecture | QPI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 2 |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 16 threads |
| L2 cache | 2 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 20 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm |
| Max CPUs | 2 |
| Clock multiplier | 23 |
| Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C |
integrated graphics
| GPU | None |
|---|
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Quad Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 51,200 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $641 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A10-9600P | ||
| | VS |  |
| $641 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $168 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $296 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 5200U vs 7410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $344 | $296 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $641 | ||
| 6200U vs 7200U | ||
