|
| 7.2 Out of 10 |  |
by Johan-De-Gelas (Sep, 2014)Clock speed has clearly been traded in for more cores in most of server SKUs.
by Johan-De-Gelas (Sep, 2014)Take the following graph with a grain of salt as the benchmark is not the most accurate (results tend to vary by 5-8%), but still it gives a rough idea of what you can expect.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Xeon E5-2643
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Cost to Run | |
| | |
| Commercial Energy Cost | |
Value | |
| | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
| 7.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Cost to Run and Value | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Xeon E5-2643
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 8 Sep |
|
However, it's not a case of the Haswell's L3 cache being a lot worse: the 20MB L3 cache of the Xeon E5-2667 v3 is only slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2690 and is still faster than the Xeon E5-2697 v2 (30MB).
Of course, those kind of bandwidth numbers only matter for specific HPC benchmarks as the L3 cache (30-45MB L3) will take care of most of the requests.
| 16 Dec |
|
They claim it will be Intel's first 14nm Xeon processor which obviously suggests that it will not be preceded by Broadwell in the lower performance server categories.
Intel will apparently allow Haswell and Broadwell to give off a little more heat than their predecessors.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Cores | Quad core |
| Socket type | LGA 2011 |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction-set-extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 130W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 10.01 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 105.63W |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Quad Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 51,200 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 8 threads |
| L2 cache | 1 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 10 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nms |
| Max CPUs | 2 |
| Clock multiplier | 35 |
| Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 73°C |
gpu
| GPU | None |
|---|---|
| Label | None |
| Latest DirectX | None |
| Number of displays supported | None |
| GPU clock speed | None |
| Turbo clock speed | None |
| 3DMark06 | None |
bus
| Architecture | QPI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 2 |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,439 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $330 | $235 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $327 | $362 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 5820K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $327 | $232 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs i5 4690K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $85 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 3110M vs Pentium N3530 | ||
| | VS | |
| $330 | $327 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | $393 | |
| Intel Core i5 4210U vs i7 4510U | ||
