|
| 8.1 Out of 10 |  | by Ian-Cutress (Nov, 2014) by Ian-Cutress (Nov, 2014) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 20 Nov |
|
For our test we use the in-game benchmarking tools and record the frame time for the first ~70 seconds of the Tashgar single player mission, which is an on-rails generation of and rendering of objects and textures.
FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping.
| 29 Oct |
|
If that is not enough cores, then you can pick up an eight-socket motherboard and load it up with multiple of these.
While Ivy Bridge-EX was available with up to 15 physical cores per processor, double that with HyperThreading, Haswell-EX is increasing that to 18, or 36 simultaneous threads with HyperThreading.
| 11 Sep |
|
This chart shows how an aggressor VM can start to degrade performance until cache monitoring detects this, partitions the cache, and restores packet performance.
The core will slow during the execution of the AVX instruction in order to maintain TDP limits, which may cause the frequency to drop.
| 8 Sep |
|
For a workstation or server builder, in the 2S market, Haswell-EP offers an unmatched combination of performance and features.
Obviously the efficiency improvements that you get with AVX code will more than make up for the clock speed differences.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Cores | Quad core |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 84W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 13.72 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W |
bus
| Architecture | DMI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 0 |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 8 threads |
| L3 cache | 8 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
overclocking
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.88 GHz |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.88 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | GPU |
|---|---|
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics P4600 |
| Number of displays supported | 3 |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,250 MHz |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
