|
| 7.9 Out of 10 |  | by Jeremy-Hellstrom (Dec, 2013) by Jeremy-Hellstrom (Dec, 2013) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 9 Dec |
|
That said the Xeon doesn't fall too far behind in many tests and at $250 it is less expensive to slap into a Z87 motherboard and it will reduce your power bill somewhat.
It is a Haswell chip running at a peak speed of 1.8GHz which would be great for a small business or for a home server.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Cores | Quad core |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 45W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 5.17 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W |
bus
| Architecture | DMI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 0 |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 8 threads |
| L2 cache | 1 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 8 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
overclocking
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.5 GHz |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.5 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | GPU |
|---|---|
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics |
| Number of displays supported | 3 |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $657 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $296 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $168 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $1,117 | $281 | |
| AMD A8 7410 vs Intel Core i5 5200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $657 | ||
| AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9600P vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $296 | $344 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $657 | ||
| Intel 7200U vs Core i5 6200U | ||
