|
| 5.5 Out of 10 |  | by Ryan-Shrout (Sep, 2014) by William-Harmon (Sep, 2014) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 6 Nov |
|
Similarly to the E5-2687W V3, the moment we hit a frequency the system does not like, it returns as a complete failed POST rather than a BSOD.
As part of this review we were able to source two E5-2650L V3 CPUs with a dual CPU motherboard and offer a more competitive analysis at 130-135W total TDP against the E5-2690 V3.
| 11 Sep |
|
This chart shows how an aggressor VM can start to degrade performance until cache monitoring detects this, partitions the cache, and restores packet performance.
The core will slow during the execution of the AVX instruction in order to maintain TDP limits, which may cause the frequency to drop.
| 8 Sep |
|
For a workstation or server builder, in the 2S market, Haswell-EP offers an unmatched combination of performance and features.
Obviously the efficiency improvements that you get with AVX code will more than make up for the clock speed differences.
| 2 May |
|
Although the seller knows what he is doing, it would be interesting to see where the founder finds himself an R3 motherboard.
DDR4 memory is supported upto 2133 Mhz, after which the memory controller starts to over clock itself.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 2 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Cores | Quad core |
| Socket type | LGA 1150 |
| Is unlocked | No |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR3-1600 |
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 8 threads |
| L2 cache | 1 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 8 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
integrated graphics
| GPU | None |
|---|
power consumption
| TDP | 25W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 10.05 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 20.31W |
bus
| Architecture | DMI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 0 |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
