|
| 5.5 Out of 10 |  | by Sebastian-Peak (Oct, 2015) by Tim-Verry (Mar, 2015) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Xeon D-1528 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Xeon D-1528
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 23 Oct |
|
Even more interesting is that Intel managed to double the maximum number of cores, and consequentially combined cache size, of Xeon D design, and the nearing Xeon D launch may include a few 12-core and 16-core models with 18 MB and 24 MB cache.
These SoCs feature integrated platform controller hub (PCH), I/O, and dual 10 Gigabit Ethernet, and the initial offerings had up to a 45W TDP.
| 12 Mar |
|
Further, while the TDPs are much higher.
Xeon D seems to be the first step towards going after a market that they have in the past not really focused on.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 1.9 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Cores | Hexa core |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 35W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W |
bus
| Architecture | FSB |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 1 |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 12 threads |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
overclocking
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.9 GHz |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.9 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.9 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | None |
|---|
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR3 |
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 131,072 MB |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $168 | $300 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $1,777 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,777 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $344 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $402 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,777 | ||
| 7th Gen A6-9220 vs 6200U | ||
