|
| 7 Out of 10 |  | by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011) by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Pentium G620 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Pentium G620
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street for the Intel Pentium G620
 |
| |
|---|---|---|
What People Are Saying Give it to me straight
Socket Type
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)If you look at single threaded performance though the Intel Pentium Processor G620 does very well and wasn't too far behing the Intel Core i3-2105 processor that is clocked 500MHz faster.
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)THe AMD A8-3850 and A6-3650 'Llano' APUs are clearly in a league of their own when it comes to gaming graphics!
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)For example if you break down the performance to the street price you get ~0.87 FPS per dollar that you spent on the Intel Pentium Processor G620.
Socket
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)The Intel Pentium Processor G620 costs $73.87 shipped and for the price it does fairly well considering it scored 64 FPS on the first pass and 11 FPS on the second pass.
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)Benchmark Results:The Intel Pentium G620 is a 65W TDP processor, but the highest Wattage that we were able to get the entire test system to was just 56.1 Watts.
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)On August 3rd, 2011 Intel released a new video driver that goes by version 8.15.10.2462.
Performance
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)Benchmark Results: When it comes to multi-core performance the Intel Pentium G620 was the only dual-core processor with no Hyper-Threading in the group and the performance wasn't enough to keep up with the other processors.
by coachmark2 (Nov, 2011)Pros: Speedy performance, Great value, Stays VERY cool, rock solid stabile, Onboard graphics are GREAT for HD movies.
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)Benchmark Results: The Intel Pentium Processor G620 does not feature Intel Quick Sync Video and as a result wasn't able to run this benchmark with acceleration enabled.
Multicore
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)The Intel Pentium G620 didn't fare too well on this benchmark since it is a dual-core 2.6GHz processor without Hyper Threading technology.
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)Legit Bottom Line: The Intel Pentium G620 is a dual-core processor with a stripped down 32nm 'Sandy Bridge' processor that is aimed at entry level desktop PCs.
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)At an idle the Intel Pentium G620 used a little more power than the Intel Core i3-2120, which is strange, but not two processors are alike and power efficiency varies widely.
Applications
by coachmark2 (Nov, 2011)I've had multiple different applications open at once and found that she just keeps on chugging along.
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)The Intel Pentium G620 has identical gaming graphics performance as the Intel Core i2-2120 that costs nearly twice as much.
by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2011)One thing that we noticed is that the Intel Pentium G620 had the same gaming performance as the Intel Core i3-2120.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz |
|---|---|
| Cores | Dual core |
| Socket type | LGA 1155 |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | No |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
integrated graphics
| GPU | GPU |
|---|---|
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics |
| Number of displays supported | 2 |
| GPU clock speed | 850 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Maximum bandwidth | 17,066.66 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 2 threads |
| L2 cache | 1 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 3 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
| Clock multiplier | 26 |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C |
overclocking
| Overclock popularity | 21 |
|---|---|
| Overclock review score | 5 |
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.72 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,014.8 |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.72 GHz |
power consumption
| TDP | 65W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 27.64 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 66.84 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 1.65 pt/W |
| Idle power consumption | 54.3W |
| Peak power consumption | 76.3W |
| Typical power consumption | 70.8W |
bus
| Architecture | DMI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 1 |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $296 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $168 | $300 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| N4200 vs 6100U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $296 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS | |
| $296 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6700K | ||
