Intel N4200 

Released July, 2016
  • 1.1 GHz
  • Quad core

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel N4200

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
4,416
N3710
3,149

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,395
N3710
968

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,120 MB/s
Core i3 6100U
3,170 MB/s
N3710
411.9 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

N4200
28.3
N3710
25.2

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N4200
2,035
N3710
1,889

PassMark (Single Core)

N4200
852
N3710
567

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 1.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz
Cores Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes
Supports trusted computing No
Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 13.75 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W

bus

Architecture FSB

details

Architecture x86-64
Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm
Max CPUs 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.39 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505
Number of displays supported 3
GPU clock speed 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3
Channels Dual Channel
Supports ECC No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
Check its TDP, it's a 6W CPU. Just like the old Atom CPUs, this one is horrible. The AES results must be horribly wrong as an N270 is about 20 times faster...
wow this cpu was released in 2016??? it performs like trash even most c2d cpus are better than this shit
How come the AES results are so bad? It has embedded AES-NI!
comments powered by Disqus