Intel Core i7 4940MX 

Released January, 2014
  • 3.1 GHz
  • Quad core
  • Unlocked

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Core i7 4940MX

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 4940MX
17.4 mHash/s
Core i7 4980HQ
23.86 mHash/s
Core i7 4910MQ
17.06 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Core i7 4940MX
19.01 mPixels/s
Core i7 4910MQ
12.59 mPixels/s
Core i7 4980HQ
16.75 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i7 4940MX
1.45 fps
Core i7 4910MQ
1.34 fps
Core i7 4980HQ
1.5 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4940MX

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4940MX

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i7 4940MX
4,740,000 MB/s
Core i7 4910MQ
4,460,000 MB/s
Core i7 4980HQ
4,780,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i7 4940MX

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i7 4940MX

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Clock speed 3.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked Yes


Has a NX bit Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes
Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions
  1. MMX
  2. AES
  3. SSE
  4. SSE2
  5. SSE4.1
  6. SSE3
  7. Supplemental SSE3
  8. SSE4.2
  9. AVX 2.0
  10. AVX
  11. SSE4
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3
Channels Dual Channel
Supports ECC No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB


Architecture x86-64
Threads 8 threads
L2 cache 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm
Max CPUs 1

integrated graphics

Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported 3
GPU clock speed 400 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,350 MHz

power consumption

Annual home energy cost 13.73 $/year
Performance per watt 23.6 pt/W
Typical power consumption 46.31W


Architecture DMI 2.0
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s
Report a correction


Showing 3 comments.
It's like no one is updating this site....
where is the amd ryzen specs?
How does this continue to be the best almost 3 years later? I am not arguing it but I want to understand.
comments powered by Disqus