0 Comments
| |
|
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Core i7 2700K among desktop CPUs (over 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Core i7 2700K
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street for the Intel Core i7 2700K
| 8.0 |
|
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 |
|
| 9.6 |
|
Overall | 8.8 Out of 10 | |
What People Are Saying Give it to me straight
Socket Type
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)Benchmark Results:The AMD FX-8150 was able to out perform the Intel Core i7-2700K in this gaming benchmark, but we did see a 1-2 FPS improvement over the Core i7-2600K.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)When it comes to pricing the Intel Core i7-2700K carries a recommended channel price of $332.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)Benchmark Results: PCMark 7 showed that the AMD FX-8150 was able to score 4351 points and the Intel Core i7-2700k scored 4333.
Socket
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)Benchmark Results:The Intel Core i7-2700k uses the same amount of power as the Intel Core i7-2600K at an idle state, but was found to use 4-7 Watts more when run at various load states.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)Benchmark Results: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat doesn't exactly scale well across multiple cores and we only could see a difference with the Intel Core i7-2700K when gaming at lower resolutions.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)During regular use with all four cores under load the Intel Core i7 2700K can jump up to the rated clock frequency of 3.50GHz or 3.60GHz if Turbo mode is enabled.
Multicore
by Tech Radar (Dec, 2011)Yes, it's a very nice little quad-core chip.
by Tech Radar (Dec, 2011)Suffice to say we view its hidden cores as evidence Intel has taken its foot off the gas.
by PCMag (Apr, 2012)When Intel released its line of second-generation Core processors a year ago (under the “Sandy Bridge” code name), it offered consumers new opportunities in various areas of CPU performance, regardless of how much you wanted to spend.
Performance
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)Benchmark Results: The x264 HD benchmark is very CPU intensive and it showed the Intel Core i7-2700K beating the AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer on both the first and second passes.
by PCMag (Apr, 2012)For better integrated graphics at this point, AMD APUs are the preferred way to go—but you’ll sacrifice raw performance as a result.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)The Intel Core i7-2700K was able to tie or beat the AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer processor in all of those benchmarks.
Overclocking
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)Not a bad price considering the performance you get and remember that these are fully unlocked processors and they love to be overclocked.
by DizZz (Jan, 2013)I have been able to overclock this processor to 5.3ghz @ 1.45v stable with temperatures under 50 degrees under load under water.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)This is a fully unlocked processor, so you can manually raise or lower the multiplier if you'd like to overclock the processor.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Cores | Quad core |
| Socket type | LGA 1155 |
| Is unlocked | Yes |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | No |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 95W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 9.28 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W |
bus
| Architecture | DMI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 1 |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 8 threads |
| L2 cache | 1 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 8 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
| Clock multiplier | 35 |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C |
overclocking
| Overclock popularity | 426 |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed | 5.12 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 4,204.6 |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 5.12 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | GPU |
|---|---|
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 |
| Latest DirectX | 10.1 |
| Number of displays supported | 2 |
| GPU clock speed | 850 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Supports ECC | No |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB |
Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| VS | |
| 363 € | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
| VS | |
| 346 € | 139 € | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6100U vs N4200 | ||
| VS | |
| 226 € | 363 € | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| VS | |
| 363 € | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Guest (12:46 AM, October 9, 2015)