Intel Core i5 4570 

Released April, 2013
  • 3.2 GHz
  • Quad core
8.2 Out of 10

If your budget is super skinny, that price tag could make all the difference and we'd vote 4570.
by Tech Radar
As a gaming chip, it's very nice.
by Tech Radar

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Core i5 4570

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Core i5 4570
7.4
FX 8350
7.8
Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Core i5 4570
9.5
FX 8350
8.3
Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Core i5 4570
7.8
FX 8350
9.9
Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Core i5 4570
7.3
FX 8350
7.4
Performance Per Dollar

8.2

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Core i5 4570
8.2
FX 8350
8.1

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Core i5 4570

GeekBench (32-bit)

Core i5 4570
10,071
A8 5545M
2,797
Core i5 4670K
11,541

GeekBench (64-bit)

Core i5 4570
10,739
Core i5 4670K
12,713
FX 8350
12,238

GeekBench

Core i5 4570
10,739
A8 5545M
2,797
FX 8350
12,796

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Core i5 4570
6,918
FX 8320
6,200
Core i5 4440
6,390

Passmark

Core i5 4570
7,068
A8 5545M
2,571
FX 8350
9,134

Passmark (Single Core)

Core i5 4570
2,068
A8 5545M
817
FX 8320
1,402

Reviews Word on the street for the Intel Core i5 4570


7.0
The new base clock strap overclocking option doesn't appear, and the chip falls over if you meddle with the base clock itself.

What People Are Saying Give it to me straight

Socket Type

When you think about it in those terms, the whole thing becomes incredibly infuriating and the 4570 starts looking like a way to stick it to the man.
by Tech Radar
The two more expensive chips are clearly miles ahead of the 4570 when all are running at their maximum overclock.
by Tech Radar
OK, the benchmark numbers betray a performance delta of about 10 per cent, but you're not going to feel that in-game.
by Tech Radar

Overclocking

But like we said, that assumes you're going to overclock in the first place, which is hardly a given.
by Tech Radar
Again, all this changes if you take overclocking into account.
by Tech Radar

Applications

Things are a bit different when it comes to more efficiently multi-threaded code, like video crunching and professional rendering.
by Tech Radar

Price

If it's cheaper, it's all good, and it is, but only a little.
by Tech Radar

Type of CPU

Intel can only get away with all this because AMD can't compete in this part of the market.
by Tech Radar

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 3.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked No
Is hyperthreaded No

features

Has a NX bit Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes
Has vitualization support Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
  1. AES
  2. SSE4.1
  3. SSE3
  4. Supplemental SSE3
  5. SSE2
  6. AVX 2.0
  7. MMX
  8. SSE
  9. SSE4
  10. SSE4.2
  11. AVX
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

gpu

GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type
  1. DDR3-1600
  2. DDR3-1333
Channels Dual Channel
Supports ECC No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB

details

Architecture x86-64
Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms
Max CPUs 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.72°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 0
Overclocked clock speed 3.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.73 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 6,808
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.63 GHz

power consumption

TDP 84W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 12.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W

bus

Architecture DMI
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
I noticed that you are putting Single-core and Multi-core scores in the same basket, and comparing them. I saw this when i was doing some CPU-s comparison as well. In the Geekbench chart, you posted a score of 3212 (which is single-core test result), and below you have i5 3570 and 3570k that scored ~13000 and ~15000 which is Multi-core. These CPUs score around 3100 and 3500 respectively in single-core tests, with a small margin depending if it's 32-bit or 64-bit.
No problem, here are screenshots(full size this time) of settings(and another score) used in 3dmark pro: http://tinypic.com/r/2w4l6e0/5 http://tinypic.com/r/317k1o6/5
Thanks for pointing that out. We were using the score that future mark has posted here: http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/cpu/Intel+Core+i5-4570/review But it seems way too low given what other similar CPUs score. I've updated our benchmarks to use your value, the site will be updated in the next few hours.
Gotta say that the physics score is very inaccurate. I recently bought 4570 and did some 3dmark tests and got result of 6853. Posting screenshot: http://tinypic.com/r/2n7ji48/5
comments powered by Disqus