0 Comments
|
|
3.5 Out of 10 | | by Ian-Cutress (Sep, 2014) by hassan-mujtaba (Sep, 2014) |
|
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Core i5 450M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
3.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Core i5 450M
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
5 Sep | |
One of the main graphs Intel was pushing in their briefing was this one, indicating what power is required for a fanless tablet.
With the 12.5-inch size and 7.3mm width, it sounds like the T300 Chi will be modifying the Core M CPU to be around 4W in order to keep the 41C skin temperature as a maximum.
5 Sep | |
The Core M 5Y70 is the highest performance part with a base clock speed of 1.10 GHz that can scale up to 2.6 GHz with one or both cores active.
At least one partner has already announced a Core M product: the Lenovo ThinkPad Helix.
5 Sep | |
The majority of the die is dedicated to the graphics core while there are two CPU cores and right below is a shared 4 MB L3 cache which is shared across the graphics and processor cores.
Since Core M is the first 14nm device, it will meet the demands of next iteration of mobility devices boasting better performance and efficiency.
11 Aug | |
The delays and fab cancellations that followed took a great deal of wind out of its sails, leaving us to wonder if the 14nm delays would push back the entire product stack.
This wouldn’t be the first time that Intel unleashed a vastly improved product that failed to grab much market attention.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz |
---|---|
Turbo clock speed | 2.66 GHz |
Cores | Dual core |
Socket type |
|
Is unlocked | No |
features
Has a NX bit | Yes |
---|---|
Supports trusted computing | No |
Has virtualization support | Yes |
Instruction set extensions |
|
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
TDP | 35W |
---|---|
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year |
Performance per watt | 3.36 pt/W |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W |
bus
Architecture | DMI |
---|---|
Number of links | 1 |
Transfer rate | 2,500 MT/s |
details
Architecture | x86-64 |
---|---|
Threads | 4 threads |
L2 cache | 1 MB |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core |
L3 cache | 3 MB |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core |
Manufacture process | 32 nm |
Transistor count | 382,000,000 |
Max CPUs | 1 |
Clock multiplier | 18 |
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed | 2.68 GHz |
---|---|
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 930.7 |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.68 GHz |
integrated graphics
GPU | GPU |
---|---|
Label | Intel® HD Graphics |
Number of displays supported | 2 |
GPU clock speed | 500 MHz |
Turbo clock speed | 766 MHz |
memory controller
Memory controller | Built-in |
---|---|
Memory type |
|
Channels | Dual Channel |
Supports ECC | No |
Maximum bandwidth | 17,066.66 MB/s |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB |

Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||