0 Comments
|
|
6.1 Out of 10 | | by Ian-Cutress (Sep, 2014) by Ian-Cutress (Sep, 2014) |
|
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Core i3 3110M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
6.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Core i3 3110M
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
In The News From around the web
9 Apr | |
Instead of absolutely guaranteeing that a chip will reach a certain speed at a given temperature or power consumption level, simply establish that frequency range as a “maybe” and push the issue off on OEMs or enthusiasts to deal with.
In several cases, the gaps in both CPU and GPU workloads are quite significant — and favor the slower processor.
27 Oct | |
The fact that Chrome runs poorly — markedly worse than Internet Explorer — could be indicative of GPU driver issues, while the 3.5W TDP target Lenovo apparently locked in would explain the throttling behavior.
It’s possible that these weak performance figures and throttling issues are either caused by Intel drivers or by overly aggressive chip positioning.
5 Sep | |
One of the main graphs Intel was pushing in their briefing was this one, indicating what power is required for a fanless tablet.
With the 12.5-inch size and 7.3mm width, it sounds like the T300 Chi will be modifying the Core M CPU to be around 4W in order to keep the 41C skin temperature as a maximum.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz |
---|---|
Cores | Dual core |
Socket type | rPGA 988B |
Is unlocked | No |
features
Has a NX bit | Yes |
---|---|
Supports trusted computing | No |
Has virtualization support | Yes |
Instruction set extensions |
|
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
TDP | 35W |
---|---|
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year |
Performance per watt | 3.69 pt/W |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W |
memory controller
Memory controller | Built-in |
---|---|
Memory type |
|
Channels | Dual Channel |
Supports ECC | No |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB |
details
Architecture | x86-64 |
---|---|
Threads | 4 threads |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core |
L3 cache | 3 MB |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core |
Manufacture process | 22 nm |
Max CPUs | 1 |
Clock multiplier | 24 |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C |
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed | 2.43 GHz |
---|---|
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,197.2 |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz |
integrated graphics
GPU | GPU |
---|---|
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 |
Latest DirectX | 11.0 |
Number of displays supported | 3 |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz |
bus
Architecture | DMI 2.0 |
---|---|
Number of links | 1 |
Data rate | 2,560 MB/s |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s |

Follow us
Compare
Competitors
Compare | AMD A8 4500M
|
Compare | |
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$296 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $168 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6100U vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $296 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A6-9220 | ||