0 Comments
|
|
5.6 Out of 10 | | by Ryan-Shrout (Aug, 2014) by Ian-Cutress (Sep, 2014) |
|
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Core i3 2348M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Core i3 2348M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
9 Apr | |
Instead of absolutely guaranteeing that a chip will reach a certain speed at a given temperature or power consumption level, simply establish that frequency range as a “maybe” and push the issue off on OEMs or enthusiasts to deal with.
In several cases, the gaps in both CPU and GPU workloads are quite significant — and favor the slower processor.
3 Nov | |
All new CPUs are slated for a Q4 launch, which would mean that they might become available for end users in products on the shelf sometime in Q1 2015.
These initial CPUs should be properly available to the public in Q4 in devices such as the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro using the Core M-5Y70.
5 Sep | |
One of the main graphs Intel was pushing in their briefing was this one, indicating what power is required for a fanless tablet.
With the 12.5-inch size and 7.3mm width, it sounds like the T300 Chi will be modifying the Core M CPU to be around 4W in order to keep the 41C skin temperature as a maximum.
5 Sep | |
The majority of the die is dedicated to the graphics core while there are two CPU cores and right below is a shared 4 MB L3 cache which is shared across the graphics and processor cores.
Since Core M is the first 14nm device, it will meet the demands of next iteration of mobility devices boasting better performance and efficiency.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz |
---|---|
Cores | Dual core |
Socket type | rPGA 988B |
Is unlocked | No |
features
Has a NX bit | Yes |
---|---|
Supports trusted computing | No |
Has virtualization support | Yes |
Instruction set extensions |
|
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
TDP | 35W |
---|---|
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year |
Performance per watt | 3.7 pt/W |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W |
bus
Architecture | DMI |
---|---|
Number of links | 1 |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s |
details
Architecture | x86-64 |
---|---|
Threads | 4 threads |
L2 cache | 1 MB |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core |
L3 cache | 3 MB |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core |
Manufacture process | 32 nm |
Max CPUs | 1 |
Clock multiplier | 23 |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 85°C |
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed | 2.3 GHz |
---|---|
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.3 GHz |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.3 GHz |
integrated graphics
GPU | GPU |
---|---|
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 |
Number of displays supported | 2 |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz |
memory controller
Memory controller | Built-in |
---|---|
Memory type |
|
Channels | Dual Channel |
Supports ECC | No |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB |

Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$296 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $168 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6100U vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $296 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A6-9220 | ||