Intel Celeron 1037U 

Released January, 2013
  • 1.8 GHz
  • Dual core
4.7 Out of 10

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Celeron 1037U among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Celeron 1037U
4.1
Core i3 3217U
4.7
Celeron 1007U
3.9
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Celeron 1037U
5.4
Core i3 3217U
5.3
Celeron 1007U
5.0
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Celeron 1037U
2.0
Core i3 3217U
2.7
Celeron 1007U
1.9
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Celeron 1037U
4.9
Core i3 3217U
6.0
Celeron 1007U
4.8
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Celeron 1037U
7.2
Core i3 3217U
8.1
Celeron 1007U
7.0
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Celeron 1037U
10.0
Core i3 3217U
6.8
Celeron 1007U
6.5
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
4.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Celeron 1037U
4.7
Core i3 3217U
4.7
Celeron 1007U
3.3

Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Celeron 1037U

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1037U
3.03 mHash/s
Core i3 3217U
10.79 mHash/s
Celeron 1007U
3.71 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1037U
0.39 fps
Core i3 3217U
0.86 fps
Celeron 1007U
0.33 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Celeron 1037U
1,508
Core i3 3217U
1,810
Celeron 1007U
1,496

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Celeron 1037U
859
Core i3 3217U
1,540
Celeron 1007U
851

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

Celeron 1037U
1,936
Core i3 3217U
2,966
Celeron 1007U
1,732

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1037U
2,571
Core i3 3217U
3,037
Celeron 1007U
2,141

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1037U
1,468
Celeron 1007U
1,245
Core i3 3217U
1,441

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s
Celeron 1007U
78,500 MB/s
Core i3 3217U
93,600 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core
Socket type BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit Yes
Supports trusted computing No
Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions
  1. MMX
  2. SSE
  3. SSE2
  4. SSE4.1
  5. SSE3
  6. Supplemental SSE3
  7. SSE4.2
  8. SSE4
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year
Performance per watt 5.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W

bus

Architecture DMI
Number of links 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s

details

Architecture x86-64
Threads 2 threads
L2 cache 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm
Max CPUs 1
Clock multiplier 18
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3
Channels Dual Channel
Supports ECC No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
Guest (09:18 AM, October 20, 2015)
This tops my Celeron 2957U. I'm not quite sure of the numbering system of the Celerons - is it similiar to that of the Core processors?
billywws (11:18 AM, July 20, 2015)
This is the worst processor ever for gaming. Counter-Strike Global Offensive paired with a GTX 750 Ti is UNPLAYABLE ON MINIMAL SETTINGS. It's slow, sluggish and cheaply made and will be a MAJOR bottleneck for any video card. Do NOT use this abysmal excuse for a CPU! WORST CPU EVER MADE.
Mk333 (05:32 PM, February 23, 2015)
I have a htpc with this processor. I like it since it is silent, but gaming performance is mediocre. The sims 3 and cities xl are fast enough but will struggle when you have alot of things in your screen. still good for emulation up to psp though, Saturn games are okay too, some ps2 games that is very simple such as visual novel games are playable and fast.
Guest (04:32 PM, April 29, 2014)
I was shocked to discover that this CPU, with an integrated Intel GPU, actually has some mild gaming chops. Mind you, it's only going to be games like Minecraft and older titles such as RollerCoaster Tycoon 3, but I've got an older Core i3 that can't run either at playable framerates. This CPU can!
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss