|
| 4.8 Out of 10 |  | by Peter-Scott (May, 2013) by Peter-Scott (May, 2013) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the Intel Celeron 1000M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 4.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the Intel Celeron 1000M
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 27 May |
|
With Temash and Kabini just around the corner, Intel needs to step up its game in the low-end low-voltage market fast, but at this point it seems that AMD be the first to market and it will enjoy at least a few months on top.
The N2805 is a dual-core clocked at 1.46GHz, with a single megabyte of cache.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz |
|---|---|
| Cores | Dual core |
| Socket type | rPGA 988B |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | No |
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 35W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 2.12 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W |
bus
| Architecture | DMI |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 1 |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s |
| Clock speed | 100 MHz |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 2 threads |
| L2 cache | 1 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 2 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
| Clock multiplier | 18 |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C |
overclocking
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | GPU |
|---|---|
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics |
| Number of displays supported | 3 |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR3 |
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Supports ECC | No |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Competitors
 | AMD E2 1800
|
 | |
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
