AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B 

First seen on January, 2016
  • 3.5 GHz
  • Quad core
8.8 Out of 10

Richland isn’t much different from Trinity, but it's more efficient thanks to specific Turbo Core optimizations that include a greater number of P-states to facilitate more granular power and performance levels.
by Don-Woligroski (Jun, 2013)
Turbo Core Clock Rate4 GHz3.8 GHz3.8 / 3.3 GHzGPU Shaders512384384GPU Clock Rate720 MHz720 MHz720 MHz"Compute Cores"121010Price$173$152$119 Both of the just-launched Kaveri-based APUs are 95 W parts (ironically, the thermal ceiling AMD appears least concerned with).
by Chris-Angelini (Jan, 2014)

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
7.3
A10 7800
7.9
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
7.2
A10 7800
6.6
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
n.d.
A10 7800
8.7
Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
9.5
A10 7800
10.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
7.9
A10 7800
8.0
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
n.d.
A10 7800
n.d.
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
8.8
A10 7800
9.1

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
86.87 mHash/s
PRO A A8 A8 PRO-7600B
62.51 mHash/s
A10 7800
87.07 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
17.2 mPixels/s
PRO A A8 A8 PRO-7600B
13.01 mPixels/s
A10 7800
18.27 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
232.72 fps
A10 7800
315.42 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
1.24 fps
A10 7800
1.59 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
25.69 fps
A10 7800
27.72 fps

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
5,313
A10 7800
5,205

PassMark (Single Core)

PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7800B
1,444
A10 7800
1,597

In The News From around the web

3
Aug

AMD A-Series A10-7870K Kaveri Refresh APU Review

by Steven Bassiri |
www.tweaktown.com
Performance (including Overclocking)84%Quality including Design and Build90%General Features93%Bundle and Packaging94%Value for Money96% Overall TweakTown Rating91% The Bottom Line: AMD's A10-7870K APU proved to be an excellent value part, offering exceptional integrated graphics and decent CPU performance at a very fair price.
Overall, I found that the AMD A10-7870K proved to be an excellent value product, offering exceptional integrated graphics and decent CPU performance at a very fair price.
The initial launch in January also featured another part that never became available until now; the A8-7600 was supposed to be available some months ago, but is only making it to market now.
Its weakness is certainly that of only having one module active, and that module only having ½ the L2 cache enabled.
31
Jul

AMD A10-7800 Review: Testing the A10 65W Kaveri

by Ian Cutress |
www.anandtech.com
We have not the slightest clue when AMD will have this competition, but it looks good for AMD given that recent reports suggest that Broadwell for the desktop may be delayed beyond the expected launch of 14nm Core-M in Q1 2015.
Having your mainstream platform headed up by two 95W APUs of the latest generation architecture for so long does nothing for the low power crowd, and AMD’s official reasons for delaying the launch of their 65W parts is due to the lower power message AMD wants to convey, especially in terms of configurable TDP.
We should expect some decent IPC gains from the new cores and the additional core count will ofcourse help overall compute.
Now if you take a look at the logo you will notice that it says “Elite Hexa Core”, which means that Carrizo APU has 6 cores and considering the TDP (95W) and core clock of 4.4 Ghz thats pretty damn impressive.

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz
Cores Quad core
Is unlocked No

features

Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions
  1. FMA4
  2. AVX
  3. AES

power consumption

TDP 65W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 7.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W

details

Threads 4 threads
L2 cache 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core
L3 cache None
Manufacture process 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ R7
Latest DirectX 12.0
GPU clock speed 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3-2133
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus