AMD Opteron 6272

$540
  • 2.1 GHz
  • 16 core
Released November, 2011
I tested my 32cores system under Linux Ubuntu 11.10 for protein folding (100% cpu utilization for several days) and its performance is less than 24cores (2p 6172) system.
Rated 60% by by T.-Luong (Feb, 2012)

Conclusion Check out the AMD Opteron 6272

Performance

Overall performance using all cores

Opteron 6272
N/A
N/A
Xeon E5-2620
N/A
N/A
Xeon X5550
N/A
N/A
Ingredients: Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench and x264 HD 4.0 (Pass 1)

Single-core Performance

Performance of an individual core

Opteron 6272
N/A
N/A
Xeon E5-2620
N/A
N/A
Xeon X5550
N/A
N/A
Ingredients: Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core), Passmark (Single Core) and x264 HD 4.0 (Pass 2)

Cost to Run

Opteron 6272
5.0
5.0
Xeon E5-2620
5.1
5.1
Xeon X5550
5.1
5.1
Ingredients: Commercial Energy Cost

Value

Opteron 6272
N/A
N/A
Xeon E5-2620
N/A
N/A
Xeon X5550
N/A
N/A
Ingredients: Performance Per Dollar

No score yet

* We don't have enough data yet to properly rate this processor

Performance Real world tests of AMD Opteron 6272

 

Features Key features of the AMD Opteron 6272

clock speed

If you are running VMs with lite loads or webservers then it works just fine, but don't expect miraculous performance for floating points scientific calculations.
Opteron 6272 by T.-Luong (Feb, 2012)

L2 cache

AMD Opteron 6272
Intel Xeon X5550
Intel Core i5 3570K

L3 cache

AMD Opteron 6272
Intel Core i5 3570K
Intel Xeon X5550

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

 

Our analysis How does it stack up against its top 10 competitors

pros

  • 16 MB
  • AES, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4a, Supplemental SSE3
  • G34, G34
  • 16
  • 16 MB
  • 16
  • 4
  • 1 MB/core

cons

  • 2.1 GHz
  • CPU cores will not be used to their full potential
  • 55 °C
  • 93.44W
  • 1 MB/core
  • Nov, 2011
  • 2.4 GHz
  • 100.74 $/year
  • 27.7 $/year

Reviews Word on the street

Rated 86% by 1 users at amazon.com
That's why its price is cheaper than an opteron 6172 (12cores 12FPUs) and op6172 consumes less power also.
Rated 60% by by T.-Luong (Feb, 2012)
I don't know if newer linux kernels or Windows 8 going to optimize for bulldozer/interlagos cpus, lets see.
Rated 60% by by T.-Luong (Feb, 2012)

Competition What else you should consider

Front view of AMD Opteron 6272

New duel?

Let the battle continue or dare to compare.


Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the AMD Opteron 6272

AMD
6272

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: