AMD FX 9370 

Released July, 2013
  • 4.4 GHz
  • Octa core
  • Unlocked
5.5 Out of 10

These chips are the result of tuning and binning on GlobalFoundries’ 32nm SOI process, though the latest jump from the existing FX-8350 is nonetheless quite impressive.
by Jarred-Walton (Jun, 2013)
The FX-9000 series is now AMD’s highest performance four module/eight core processor for their AM3+ platform, but it’s an incremental improvement from the FX-8000 series in the same way that the Radeon HD 8000 series is an incremental improvement on the HD 7000 GCN offerings.
by Jarred-Walton (Jun, 2013)
Explore 2 desktops with the AMD FX 9370

CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD FX 9370 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

FX 9370
7.6
FX 8350
7.4
FX 9590
8.1
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

FX 9370
7.1
FX 8350
6.9
FX 9590
7.4
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

FX 9370
0.0
FX 8350
0.0
FX 9590
0.0
Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

FX 9370
0.0
FX 8350
0.0
FX 9590
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

FX 9370
5.0
FX 8350
5.7
FX 9590
5.1
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

FX 9370
5.8
FX 8350
6.3
FX 9590
5.7
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

FX 9370
5.5
FX 8350
5.8
FX 9590
5.6

Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD FX 9370

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 9370
11,930
FX 9590
13,818
FX 8350
11,483

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 9370
2,366
FX 9590
2,549
FX 8350
2,193

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 9370
2,520,000 MB/s
FX 9590
2,790,000 MB/s
FX 8350
2,470,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 9370
11,795
FX 9590
12,725
FX 8350
10,956

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 9370
11,555
FX 9590
13,802
FX 8350
12,126

GeekBench

FX 9370
11,795
FX 9590
13,802
FX 8350
12,796

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 9370
9,578
FX 9590
10,589
FX 8350
9,134

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 9370
1,611
FX 9590
1,719
FX 8350
1,525

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Clock speed 4.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4.7 GHz
Cores Octa core
Socket type AM3+
Is unlocked Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes
Has virtualization support Yes
Instruction set extensions
  1. MMX
  2. SSE4.2
  3. AVX 1.1
  4. Supplemental SSE3
  5. FMA4
  6. ABM
  7. AMD-V
  8. SSE4.1
  9. XOP
  10. TBM
  11. AVX
  12. AMD64
  13. SSE
  14. BMI1
  15. F16C
  16. FMA3
  17. AES
  18. SSE4a
  19. SSE3
  20. CVT16
  21. CLMUL
  22. SSE2
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None

details

Architecture x86-64
Threads 8 threads
L2 cache 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm
Transistor count 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1
Die size 319 mm²
Clock multiplier 23
Voltage range 1.91 - 2V
Operating temperature Unknown - 57°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.96 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.78 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.96 GHz

power consumption

TDP 220W
Annual home energy cost 53 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 192.72 $/year
Performance per watt 4.96 pt/W
Typical power consumption 178.75W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in
Memory type DDR3-1866
Channels Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes
Maximum bandwidth 29,866.66 MB/s
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
Pfft, what a piece of overheated garbage
I get much different results also with an FX9370! This site is very bias! Most reviewers are in my opinion! Check out Tech syndicate on youtube. They have the most non bias opinions out there. They were blown away by the 8350, It killed 9\10 benchmarks\games so it makes this review redundant! I get 39c temps at full load with an NHD15 and my Cinebench score @5ghz is on par with an i7 4770k and in games I get comparable fps to most i7 cpu's even my 5820k! So I don't know where this sight is getting their information from?!
the only issues being tdp and heat management, high frequency memory is always great
This score is way off.I get temps in idle of 0.0c when i`m away from my computer.Using CPU-Temp not the Trojan one.You can see what is the difference.This is a 9.7 Ranked processor. An it`s memory control type is a 2133 not 1866.I do not know who did your research but that was a mistake.All the rest of this is canned benchmarks an i dont believe any of them are accurate anymore.After doing my own test.
comments powered by Disqus