|
| 8.1 Out of 10 |  |
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)Like the K Series Intel chips, the entire FX range is unlocked, so overclocking is definitely on the menu.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)If you're looking to upgrade from an older system you really can't beat the price to performance ratio offered with an eight core 4GHz processor processor for only $195!
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD FX 8350
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
| 8.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD FX 8350
GeekBench (32-bit)
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street for the AMD FX 8350
 |
| |
|---|---|---|
 |
| |
Overall | Out of 10 | |
What People Are Saying Give it to me straight
Socket Type
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)The new FX processors will be manufactured using Global Foundries' 32nm process and consists of ~1.2 billion transistors.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)It is a direct sequel to 2005's Battlefield 2, and the eleventh installment in the Battlefield franchise.
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)If pricing follows the previous generation then you're looking at around a £70 difference, and that could make for that bump up to a HD 7950.
Socket
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)Today we stuck to increasing the multiplier and left the Bclk alone, we were able to bring the FX-8350 to a rock solid 4.9GHz without breaking a sweat.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)I have heard it said on countless occasions that you get 80% of the performance for 60% of the price.
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)That performance gap gets even bigger when you chuck the HD encoding benchmark of X264 v4.0 at the pair with the FX-8350 getting almost 25 per cent better results than the Intel i5.
Performance
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)Benchmark Results: The second pass of the X264 HD Video Encoding benchmark is much more processor intensive than the first pass.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)Two of our game benchmarks don't benefit from the faster processors today.
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)It's not quite the 1GHz+ speed boost you can get out of Intel's architecture, but it does give you some impressive performance gains.
Applications
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)Single-threaded prowess still counts for a lot, not least in gaming.
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)Your graphics card is most responsible for your gaming experience, so it makes sense to drop the most cash on that.
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)With the AMD software though, it remained happily numbercrunching away.
Multicore
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)The new AMD 'Piledriver' modules are essentially revamped 'Bulldozer' cores.
by PCMag (Nov, 2012)While this has allowed AMD to pack more cores into the same space, it's also impacted the performance of each particular core.
by PCMag (Nov, 2012)Intel CPUs have fewer cores, but the performance of each individual core tends to be higher.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 4 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Cores | Octa core |
| Socket type | AM3+ |
| Is unlocked | Yes |
| Is hyperthreaded | No |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction-set-extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
gpu
| GPU | None |
|---|---|
| Label | None |
| Latest DirectX | None |
| Number of displays supported | None |
| GPU clock speed | None |
| Turbo clock speed | None |
| 3DMark06 | None |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
|
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Maximum bandwidth | 29,866.66 MB/s |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 8 threads |
| L2 cache | 8 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 8 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nms |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
overclocking
| Overclock popularity | 709 |
|---|---|
| Overclock review score | 0.95 |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.37 GHz |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 10,147 |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.7 GHz |
power consumption
| TDP | 125W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 56.1 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 159.62 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 4.97 pt/W |
| Idle power consumption | 92W |
| Peak power consumption | 182.21W |
| Typical power consumption | 159.66W |
bus
| Clock speed | 2,600 MHz |
|---|
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,435 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $345 | $234 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $336 | $390 | |
| 4790K vs 5820K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $336 | $235 | |
| 4790K vs 4690K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $85 | $161 | |
| 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| | VS | |
| $345 | $336 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $329 | ||
| 3217U vs N2830 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
