|
| 5.3 Out of 10 |  | by Ian-Cutress (Jan, 2015) by Ian-Cutress (Jan, 2015) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD FX 8320E among desktop CPUs (over 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD FX 8320E
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 13 Jan |
|
However, no matter which way the segment is sliced, there are relatively few new motherboards on the market.
Due to the construction of some of the early motherboards intended for AMD’s non-IGP line, these early motherboards could only support 95W or 125W maximum, let alone the 220W of the FX9590/9370 behemoths.
| 23 Aug |
|
Next up, we have the FX-8320E which is an optimized FX-8320 with a core clock of 3.50 GHz, turbo clock of 4.00 GHz, an 8 MB L3 Cache and a 95W TDP.
AMD does have steamroller but they aren’t focusing it towards the high-end desktop market instead focusing it towards the APU market with their Kaveri APUs and Athlon processors.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 4 GHz |
| Cores | Octa core |
| Socket type | AM3+ |
| Is unlocked | Yes |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 95W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 11.13 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| L2 cache | 8 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 8 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm |
| Transistor count | 1,200,000,000 |
| Die size | 319 mm² |
| Clock multiplier | 20 |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70.5°C |
overclocking
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.56 GHz |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.56 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | None |
|---|
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR3-1866 |
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 29,866.66 MB/s |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
