0 Comments
| |
|
| 5.3 Out of 10 | | by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011) by Tech Radar (Oct, 2011) |
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD FX 8150 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)
Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD FX 8150
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Reviews Word on the street for the AMD FX 8150
| 7.0 |
|
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 |
|
| 9.2 |
|
Overall | 7.8 Out of 10 | |
What People Are Saying Give it to me straight
Socket Type
by jcfsusmc (May, 2012)Idle temps are always in the teens, and processor core temps in the 40c range come about only during benchmark or other "full load" requiring software applications.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)The new instruction sets will most likely help out AMD in some of the benchmarks tests that we will run today and down the road when Windows 8 comes out.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)In the more recent AMD platforms, AM2, AM2+, and AM3 we were able to take the latest generation processor and drop it into the previous generation motherboard.
Socket
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)When we look at the performance of the Intel Core i7-990X and the AMD FX-8150 at a much more realistic gaming resolution (for processors of this caliber) the difference is only 2 frames per second (1.3%) in favor of the Intel Core i7-990X.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)From the looks of things the main difference between the FX-8150 and the 1100T is the data decrypting test suite.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)According to Windows 7 the lowest performing component on the system was the processor, which would be the AMD FX-8150 CPU, as it had a subscore of 7.6 and that is the base score for the entire system.
Performance
by Tech Radar (Oct, 2011)World in Conflict is a great CPU benchmark in gaming terms as different CPU hardware genuinely can show a difference.
by Legit Reviews (Sep, 2011)Once we get these processors in hand we are definitely looking forward to seeing what they can do in terms of performance.
by PCMag (Oct, 2011)For years now, those scoping out a system (or just the parts to build one) have had a simple choice to make when it comes to processors: Do you want the best performance (Intel) or do you want the best value (AMD)?
Multicore
by Tech Radar (Oct, 2011)Even the ageing Phenom II cores run faster than this brand new Bulldozer core.
by Tech Radar (Oct, 2011)And it is very much a new architecture; AMD has started from scratch with the design of the Bulldozer modules, taking a very different approach to what makes up a CPU core than anyone else.
by Tech Radar (Oct, 2011)It's this squeezing of two cores into each module that means AMD can produce an eight-core CPU for less than the price of Intel's top Sandy Bridge quad-core.
Applications
by Tech Radar (Oct, 2011)It may have a case, but still the vast majority of games released today are not DX11 games, they're DX10 and in some cases DX9.
by Tech Radar (Oct, 2011)What that will mean in real-world applications though we'll soon see.
by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2011)Pre-set profiles eliminate the need for any complex settings and you can just drag-and-drop the video files you want to convert straight into the application.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 3.6 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Cores | Octa core |
| Socket type | AM3+ |
| Is unlocked | Yes |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
integrated graphics
| GPU | None |
|---|---|
| Label | None |
| Latest DirectX | None |
| Number of displays supported | None |
| GPU clock speed | None |
| Turbo clock speed | None |
| 3DMark06 | None |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR3-1866 |
| Channels | Dual Channel |
| Supports ECC | Yes |
| Maximum bandwidth | 29,866.66 MB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 24,576 MB |
details
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 8 threads |
| L2 cache | 8 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core |
| L3 cache | 8 MB |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm |
| Transistor count | 1,200,000,000 |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
| Die size | 319 mm² |
| Clock multiplier | 21 |
| Voltage range | 1.22 - 1.52V |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 61°C |
overclocking
| Overclock popularity | 216 |
|---|---|
| Overclock review score | 4.5 |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.71 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.66 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.71 GHz |
power consumption
| TDP | 125W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 67.45 $/year |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 200.6 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 4.15 pt/W |
| Idle power consumption | 104W |
| Peak power consumption | 229W |
| Typical power consumption | 197.75W |
bus
| Architecture | HyperTransport 3.1 |
|---|---|
| Number of links | 1 |
| Data rate | 10,400 MB/s |
| Transfer rate | 5,200 MT/s |
| Clock speed | 2,600 MHz |