|
| 3.9 Out of 10 |  |
|
| | ||
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of the AMD E1 1500 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 3.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Benchmarks Real world tests of the AMD E1 1500
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
In The News From around the web
| 5 Aug |
|
Computing power will continue to ramp up while transistors scale down, which could make true neural simulations possible in real time with supercomputers.
This feat of computational might was made possible by the open source simulation software known as NEST.
| 22 Dec |
|
At the launch of Intel's LGA-2011 based Sandy Bridge E CPU we finally had a platform capable of supporting PCI Express 3.0, but we lacked GPUs to test it with.
As we've seen in earlier reviews and our own internal tests, there's hardly any difference between PCIe 2.1 x8 and x16 for modern day GPUs.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary
| Clock speed | 1.48 GHz |
|---|---|
| Turbo clock speed | None |
| Cores | Dual core |
features
| Has a NX bit | Yes |
|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes |
| Instruction set extensions |
|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes |
power consumption
| TDP | 18W |
|---|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year |
| Performance per watt | 2.5 pt/W |
| Typical power consumption | 14.63W |
details
| Threads | 2 threads |
|---|---|
| L2 cache | 1 MB |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core |
| Manufacture process | 40 nm |
| Max CPUs | 1 |
overclocking
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz |
|---|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.48 GHz |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz |
integrated graphics
| GPU | GPU |
|---|---|
| Label | AMD Radeon HD 7310 |
| GPU clock speed | 529 MHz |
memory controller
| Memory controller | Built-in |
|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR3-1066 |
Report a correction Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
